That is the main heading this morning on www.bbc.co.uk and here is a link to the full story:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-11833241

The campaign launches today, so the news will probably be full of happiness.

I was just looking through books about happiness on Amazon when I stumbled across a link to a Google sponsored talk by one of the authors:

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-1424079446171087119#

Very intersting. It describes a link between brain functioning and meditation. Tibetan buddhists are finding a scientific basis their practices in order to spread more happiness in a largley secular world.

 It looks like David Cameron has been reading this site, he's announced a new index of well being for Britain - GWB, General Well Being as opposed to GDP. This is how The guardian reported it.

And how is this for quite an amazing quote from a Conservative Prime Minister...

"Taking part in gardening can make a child feel happy and boost their development, research suggests."

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10427338.stm

Of course, we already knew that, but here is yet more research to back it up!

I saw this news story on the BBC News site the other day: 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/10197763.stm  

Mary Portas (a retail expert) is concerned that the domination of supermarkets is having a detrimental effect on the quality of life - "Portas said she believed communities were being sacrificed for convenience." 

Very often in life I am disappointed by the way some of my fellow humans behave. People can be very nasty, devious, scheming etc and I always feel like they are letting down the species. However, I am reminded of something comedian Rob Brydon said "Now, with any moral dilemma I always ask myself, 'What would Rod Stewart do?'". Well actually, it's not that similar, but it's a bit similar.. I have started to imagine that the bad behaviour is being done by monkeys - and miraculously it doesn't seem so bad.

Just read an interesting article about how to cut crime - "Crime: Do we need more police?"

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/parties_and_issues…

The politicians are all bellowing about putting more bobbies on the beat to cut crime figures, while criminologists are arguing that economic and social factors are more important. A line removed from a cabinet office document reads:

There's been a lot in the news recently about greedy bankers demanding huge bonuses. It looks obscene when the very rich vote themselves massive amounts of money and then try and justify it. One question that comes into my mind is "don't they already have enough stuff?". Will they ever get enough? It seems to be a tragedy of our times that we spend so long trying to get rich when actually being rich doesn't ever quite seem to be enough for anybody.

"Hello, I'm from the Happiness Party, can we count on your vote at the upcoming election?"

"Eh? The who?"

"The Happiness Party, we are a new political party devoted to making everybody happier. Our pledge is that we will only make changes which have a positive effect on the overall happiness of the population."

"Blimey, well, how are you going to do that?"

Well, here you go, the answer to all of our problems, the Happiness Hat:

http://www.lauren-mccarthy.com/happinesshat/

So, all we need to do is to make the wearing of happiness hats compulsory and we will achieve our goal of "Making Everybody Happy"...

Compulsory happiness is not the goal, I don't think anybody would want to live in a world with happiness police. And I suspect that is one possible side effect of governments measuring happiness, with any kind of measurement there is the temptation to massage the figures, find an easy way to make the numbers better.